Saving who from whom and other circular debates on gay relationships

Torn - Rescuing the Gospel from the Gay vs Christian DebateAs happens more times than I can remember, things pop up on the radio or in news articles that make me stop ignoring the white noise and pay attention. Such is the case with this short NPR Radio interview this week with Justin Lee on his book,

Torn: Rescuing the Gospel from the Gays vs. Christians Debate.

Justin Lee is an online friend from way back and I’m looking forward to reading his book (I’ve probably heard/read  most of it in conversation with him.) I may not agree with everything he has to say (how boring that would be) but his evolving method of religious thought is inspiring and worth giving a look-see. Spiritual thought in general, and quite specifically Western Christianity is a growth industry for one’s brain cells. This begins with the three legged stool of Christian belief that (a) The Bible is the inerrant word of God vs. (b) Maybe it is, but it’s edited by humans, vs. (c) everything that we need for “salvation” is found within. Christians are big – in general – on speaking of things in trinities.

I’m glad he mentions in this brief interview CS Lewis‘ remark on the separation of state marriage and church marriage, because of an online  debate that ground away at my patience with the GayChristianNetworkSide A vs. “Side B” Christians (I can’t remember which letter is which) debating “premarital” (same sex) intimacy vs. “waiting for marriage.” I saw the great spiritual danger in that debate when we speak of “waiting for” something that in many states – constitutionally – will not happen. (In their defense, the debate centered  around “waiting to be in a relationship” rather than being a gay person who is single and sexually active.)

This then leads to a very large spiritual question of: what to do?

This point makes me want to take a look at his book because: what, indeed? There are as many different types of sexual humans as there are spiritual humans, and the two needn’t be mutually-exclusive. To hold on to some theologically-irrelevant heterosexist  theory on “adultery” among people on a marriage path is too facile: if gay people either by law or by choice do not have the option of state supported and church-blessed marriage, why are we – as gay Christians – tied to an impossible to achieve ideal?

The point is to go back to one of those versus above  (not verses,) remembering that “all that is necessary for salvation is found in the Bible.”

I probably wouldn’t have responded to his interview except that he mentions one of my favorite thoughts on the topic of sin and salvation (etc.) from Tony Campolo who says that Jesus never said (or implied) “Love the sinner and hate the sin.” To believe that, I have said, goes against the singular foundation of Christian thought based on the teachings of Christ, as presented in this Bible, above, which has everything within that we need for … etc.

Jesus taught that we should “Love the sinner and hate your own sin,” and illustrated this by the famous analogy of not pointing out the speck of dust in your friend’s eye until first you have dealt with the large stick of wood pointing out from your own. I agree with Lee that this is how this discussion/debate should happen. If you want to show me some missionary zeal, before you can stand and preach on a street corner or fly off and wave your Christian flag, please do some homework – at home – first. All of life is a perpetual growing and learning process. The addition that Christians face is that great chapters of that growth happen in public view. And when we open up our hearts and minds (and too often we pre-open our mouths) things can get messy.

Lee says “I don’t blame people for coming to other conclusions than I have” on the topic of Gays and Christianity and Gospel and Commandments (pronouncements.) The great underlying adventure of the Hebrew Bible (The Old Testament) is showing us what a covenant looks like. Without that covenant, we cannot have a relationship with the God that is mentioned throughout the many books of the Bible. And guess what: we also cannot have relationships with those around us: friends, co-workers, family (even the ones we don’t like,) lovers.

Any good spiritual belief set flows forth from conversation and discussion and even argument. The best spiritual belief sets are formed when each of those arguments and discussions come from a place of respect for the others’ thoughts. They come from an inside knowledge that my telling you what I believe and how I believe it is certainly not going to sway your thoughts, but, in conversation, perhaps we can teach each other. And something will come from that. Something far greater and much stronger than the compromise of “we agree to disagree.”

Compromise without growth and improvement is a lose-lose situation.

Nobody ever said this stuff was easy. Even more so when you have to do that second coming out of “I am a gay christian,” and suddenly all your traditional Christian friends think you’ve lost your soul, and all your gay friends think you’ve lost your mind.

If you listen quite carefully, and speak quite calmly, and ask good questions, you will make great gains in both mind and soul. Whether or not your friends in either camp agree… well… that’s another parable from Christ we will save for another day.

Someone will likely ask you this year what you think about… and what you believe about….

Think first. Teach (the Baptists call it “testifying”) second. Always listen with your heart.
And from that teaching, you will learn.

Keep the faith!
- Amen

Just in case you didn’t click on the link above, here is the link to Justin Lee’s NPR interview about his book.

more about Tony Campolo on Gay People and the Church:

The Tenderness and Love of God – a call to prayer

Two joining images from Psalm 130

Sometimes when entering into our moments of reflection (aka our Prayer Closet,) we catch ourselves approaching prayers when it seems as if “all hope is gone” as they say in the movies.

Looking at the words from Psalm 130, the writer begins the poem in this very depth of  depth:

1  Out of the depths I cry to you, Lord; *
    Lord, hear my voice.  *
Let your ears be attentive
    to my cry for mercy. *

By the end of this short song, the writer rests in the peace of patience, mercy and love, repeating the sentiment with saying:

I wait for the Lord, my whole being waits,
    and in his word I put my hope. *
I wait for the Lord
    more than watchmen wait for the morning, *
    more than watchmen wait for the morning. *

The Bible teaches in many places that the followers should wait with such patience (and determination) on this forgiveness and salvation. Especially salvation from the hands of one’s enemies. And reading these teachings carefully, the Bible also teaches by word and example that this waiting for salvation cannot happen in a vacuum of inactivity.

While we cannot debase ourselves by stooping to the whispers and dirty tricks and back stabbing of our enemies that the psalmist wrote of, the followers of this ancient faith should act by said faith, to ensure the preservation of the Kingdom of God, and to present that same love and kindness, even to those who would mean us harm.

Nobody said this religion stuff was easy.
Enlightening – yes.
Easy (especially with a short temper like mine,) not so much.

Keep the faith, and watch, eagerly for the morning.

A call to prayer

I hope in the LORD
with all my heart.
I am eager for God’s coming.

(Alleluia)

With the LORD,
there is tenderness and love.
God’s compassion overflows.

(Alleluia)

 

Imagination – an act of prayer

Some days, being a spiritual person of any stripe requires just as much imagination as it does what we call “faith,” that very elusive creature.

How can it be that in a thinking, intelligent world, folks would put such heavy faith in fairy tales, legends, and unprovable folklore?

Because people need that. We need a break from pure facts and hard numbers. We need to believe, as a part of our creative selves. If we can only rely on the things we know, then our arsenal is always limited to as much factual knowledge as we have. If we rest our brains in what is possible, the horizon becomes infinite.

You mean to tell me that it really took some guy in a beard up in the sky only six days to create the entire cosmos?  In 144 hours? And that a prophet was swallowed alive by a giant fish and came out alive, that three men were thrown into a smoking furnace and emerged untouched by the heat, and that a man died and three days later, he walked out of his tomb, alive?

I mean to tell you about the world of possibilities around us and not just the numbers of probability. The decision is yours what to believe, what to follow, and even what to understand. My beliefs are not any better than yours, and more importantly – what you believe is not strong enough or callus enough or scary enough to move me from mine. Even if what you believe is as simple as “the sun will rise tomorrow,” that is to be understood and respected. People are not harmed by a sunrise. Folks do not gain power over other folks by the sun coming up in the morning. On paper, that sunrise thing sounds ok to me.

Even if I believe with all my mind and with all my heart and with all my soul that tomorrow will be the darkest night we have ever seen. I can listen to and imagine your belief about a loyal sun. I can wonder what it must feel like to have that warm light on my face. And I expect you to also imagine what a next day of endless darkness would be for me. I will not try to convince you what a fool you must be for thinking it won’t be forever dark, and you will not testify to me that sunrise is the only way it’s going to be.

That silly example is about what it means to have a faith of imagination. To have such a faith is to “put yourself in another person’s shoes” even if for a second.  Try to understand their positives, and try to see clearly and without wild reactions the negatives. Listen and understand.

Even with math and geometry we need the imaginative mind to see – to conceptualize – the vision behind the structure. And so it is with believing, likewise how it is with Faith.

Faith by definition is a belief that is not based on proof. Faith may live outside of the capability to prove (“God created the world in six days.” I can’t tell you for sure because I wasn’t there.) Faith may also live in the place in our lives before there is proof. (“God is.“) I respect both, as should you.

What Faith is not is a weapon of power. It is not a lesson to teach us that by believing a thing to be true to us  (by faith), then we have power over others, that others are lower, less-kind, more sinful, more damned than we are. The western Christians have a great line for this one, if they have the ears to hear:

“…for all alike have sinned, and all consciously come short of the glory of God,”
- Romans 3:23 (Weymouth New Testament)

All people have come up short. Even the good ones. And the smart ones. And the ones we see as damaged goods.

So damaged, as it turns out, that within them, we see a small reflection of ourselves.

It’s tough to do in these days and times to not feel the hairs on the back of your neck rise up when someone speaks to you publicly of their faith. My brain stops listening to them as I start trying to figure out if this person is going to tell me something new and interesting and imaginative, or if they are just another religious whack job trying to “convince” me of what they have that I don’t have, and what I have to do to get it.

Listen with imagination. Open yourself to hear what they have to say first before automatically throwing all people of faith into the “crackpot” bin. Maybe they have something – even if it’s only one word – that you should be hearing today.

Keep the faith!

Holy God,
you
who surpass everything we can imagine,

We worship you.

You are not far away,
but very close to us.

You heal our unfaithfulness.

Your love
knows no change
and
no end.

 - Amen

Jesus vs. the Politics of Hate

May only God’s words be spoken, and may only God’s words be heard.
Amen


Living in North Carolina and growing up in the place I’m from in Western North Carolina, I was able to just ignore the lunacy being preached from the pulpit of Providence Road Baptist Church, in Maiden, North Carolina by the pastor there, Mr. Charles Worley. I cannot use the word “Reverend” as there was absolutely nothing “Reverent” in the spewing words of un-Christian  hate he spoke from his pulpit.

I thought it would be possible to let this one just slide over me like a shiny oil slick on the surface of the water. Even though the man spoke of me in his hateful sermon, he did not speak for me.

And then I got a text message from a friend, which I paraphrase here to keep things Under the Seal of confidentiality:

An acquaintance who lives out there heard those hateful words and it caused her to stop and examine  where she was in the relationships in her life, and question the decisions made to get there. The gist of the conversation being that once such hatred is given marching orders from the pulpit, these decisions - and by them how she defines her life – must somehow be wrong.

That feeling of grief and that sensation of helplessness that this pastor caused in even one Christian soul (or any other soul, as it goes) requires discipline (correction) by other Christians who realize the great error of his speech.  And it requires help from all of us who know better to be of any assistance we can be to those who feel harmed by his words. And so, realizing that my saying nothing to this sermon of hate was wrong, here I am.

I would have this same attitude for any preacher on any topic that brought harm to others from the pulpit, and do not limit my reaction to his hate speech against Lesbian and Gay People, aka Our People. To be a purist in the realm of spiritual speech, one must stand up for the protection of all people from such hateful, sinning people and the poisonous words they spread.

Without giving  further recognition to his exact words, in summary, he said:

  1.   The President of the United States is wrong for standing in favor of gay marriage, that he (the preacher) will not vote for him, and that “if you have any sense” then neither should you. He says the Bible and God are both “agin’ it” with no clear citations, because he is arguing the obvious to folks who are also “agin’ it.”
  2.   The preacher’s solution to “getting rid” of GLBT people is to fence them off, drop in food to keep them alive, and wait for them to become extinct because of their inability to procreate.
  3.   He will not vote for “a baby killer,” and(/or?) “a homosexual lover.” He then reiterates the point to make sure there is no plausible deniability for his making this statement. To say this should put his congregation’s tax-exempt status at risk as he has, in this statement, become a political spokesman instead of a religious leader. Churches may not have a public political opinion that goes so far as to tell people how to vote. This is a violation of the First Amendment to the US Constitution stating that the state shall not be connected with an organized religion (aka no Church of England for us, thank you.)
  4.   It makes him physically ill to think of two men kissing. “Can you just imagine…” etc.

The last point is actually the easiest to address because yes I can very well imagine kissing “some man,” because why? BECAUSE JESUS DID IT!

See: the kiss is mentioned in all three of the Synoptic Gospels as Judas identifies Jesus by means of a kiss.

Both references in Matthew and Mark use the Greek verb Kataphilein, which means to kiss passionately, not just a simple peck on the cheek, not a “makeup kiss.” Not an “air kiss.” In the Gospel of Luke, this same act is followed by the last pre-crucifixion miracle performed by Jesus: the healing of the servant’s ear. Jesus  says, “No more of this!” (bickering and fighting and aggrandizing,) and heals the servant’s ear when one of the disciples cuts it off with a sword.

Jesus (physically) moves in the Luke story from that moment of pressing passion from one of his closest friends (the kiss) to a moment of serenity and divinity by announcing that all the shouting and acting like “guys” must stop. Even as these men come to take Jesus away, and even as one of the followers of Jesus draws iron in defense, Jesus shows us the way of tenderness that can be found even in the midst of despair and accusation.

But those are just the actions of Christ, actions on which the CHRISTian religion should be based.

Looking back in Jesus’ heritage, taking an example from his family line, consider the story from the life of David, who would grow up to be one of the most revered kings of the Hebrew Bible and who must have had a true “inside connection” with God, because God (is written to have) liked him so much. Before he was king, though, he became friends with the son of another king (Saul) and we have the famous story of David and Jonathan.

Hardcore Biblical conservatives argue until they are blue in the face that the relationship between the young David and Jonathan was a non-sexual friendship. Perhaps so. What David and Jonathan did in their tent at night is of no concern to me. The author of the books of Samuel says:

“…the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul.” (1 Samuel 18:1 KJV)

Have you heard words like this before… in church? How about the scriptural foundation of “marriage” in which “the two shall become one.” (Matthew 19:5 and Mark 10:8) The conservative folks who believe that the Bible is the inerrant word of God are quick to pounce on how there is no “Adam and Steve” in the creation-love-marriage story of Genesis, yet there is a David and Jonathan just a few books down the road. The important question here is: do we count something as God being “agin’ it” simply because it is not mentioned in the Bible?

Liberal readers argue the point that “there was no understanding of the word ‘gay‘ at the time the scriptures were written because such a (socio-political) concept did not exist.” This argument while having a nice sentiment leaves out many other things that exist “nowadays” that weren’t around when the Hebrew Bible was put together. Top of the list is the idea of “no-fault divorce,” which, while legal in many US states is nonetheless an abomination by Levitical law and was considered adultery in the New Covenant (between God and Man) pronounced by Jesus.

Even though Jesus was silent on the “gay marriage” issue, he was quite adamant on the sinfulness of divorce in Mark 10:7-9, coming nearly verbatim from the Christian Marriage ceremony, saying that whatever GOD has put together (in marriage) no MAN can break apart. In this public rite of Marriage within the church, the celebrant has announced that the marriage between these two people is God-Created, a lifetime bond, and there is no room for the error of divorce since only God can un-bind what is bound by God.

Coming Together as One

Continuing with the David and Jonathan story, the verse after the one above says that “From that day, Saul kept David with him and did not let him return to his father’s house.” (NIV)

Here again, an important line we hear in wedding ceremonies about how the man and woman leave the homes that raised them and strike out in a new life of their own. See: Genesis 2:4, “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother and cleave unto his wife for they shall become one flesh.” How does this idea of “coming together as one” match with the story of young David and Jonathan above? The word “identical” comes swiftly to mind.

Kissing a man returns again at the end of the David and Jonathan story in 1 Samuel 20:41 in which – as they are about to part ways, they “…kissed one another and wept with one another until David exceeded.” (KJV) the word “exceeded” here means “got control of himself.” And as they are leaving and the story ends, we get one more bit of wedding lore: the Mizpah:

And Jonathan said to David, Go in peace for as much as we have sworn both of us in the name of the LORD, saying, The LORD be with thee and me, and between thy seed and my seed forever.” (1 Samuel 20:42 KJV)

You’ve seen them before I’m sure, the Mizpa Coin necklaces which have this verse on them, and the coin is cut in two so that the loved and the beloved each wear a half, that spell out the whole verse when they join them together. No matter where the two travel, they (and their love) are always together. (By the way, the word Mizpah has a few different meanings, the most prescient of which is that it is the name of the town to which David went at the end of this story, to hide from Saul who was trying to kill him.)

Yes, this cute piece of heterosexual fluff was brought to you by way of a story of two young men who loved each other, lived together, and kissed (a lot,) and wept together.

Could you just imagine kissing a man?  Yes, after READING THE BIBLE, I believe I could.

So if “God is agin’ it” (it being Gay Marriage in the context of this sermon), where do we find that? God never speaks from the cloud or the burning bush telling some trembling, unbelieving prophet “that shalt not marry a guy.” God does not “personally” speak out against this in the Bible. I will leave the argument of the conservatives about Levitical laws of purity for another day. Also we should not consider the writings of Paul which speak of men and women leaving behind their natural desires and instead doing that which is un-natural.

The language of this scripture does indeed talk about the wrong-ness of lying with a man: when that is not one’s natural desire. The same is true (sin-wise) for a gay man who would “lie down with a woman” thus giving up his natural ldesires for being with men.  Which brings us to:

Lying about Lying

In his second point (The Final Solution) the preacher brings us all back to the days of Auschwitz and the rest of the concentration camps in his argument that makes me wonder if he has even a passing knowledge of human biology. He says that LGBT people cannot have children. And despite his facile joke about a man (praise God!) having a baby, Queer people have been procreating all the way back, and will continue to do so all the way into the future.

My initial reaction was to wonder where this man thought “gay babies” came from, if they can “only” be produced by Queer people (according to his Final Solution theory of driving them to extinction) but if they cannot procreate, where do they get new gay babies?

In spite of the idiocy of his remarks that stink of Nazism, good, well-meaning, God-fearing, paying-all-their-bills-on-time and going to church every Sunday people will continue to have children (in some small percentage) who turn out Queer. That’s just the way it works. I can count the number of Queer people in my life who were created and raised by two gay parents on less than two fingers.

And the number of Queer people I know who had every other combination of parenting under heaven… those people number more than the stars in the sky.

We cannot “kill off” gay people by rounding them up and putting them in a paddock to expire through lack of creating new children. The real “Praise God!” moment here is that if such an abominable idea were to happen, on the outside of that gate would be generation upon generation of new “gay babies” who could surround the place and make that fence fall easier than the walls of Jericho.  As Hitler’s boys found out: killing off Queer People by simply making them disappear is not possible.

So what do we believe?

You’re asking me? Ask God.

In my own life (the only one for which I can speak clearly) this is very simple and it speaks to the black rotting core of this preacher’s words, and the blind ignorance of every single person in that congregation who dared to speak the “Amen.” And even more to those who came back to the following week’s services for even more.

Jesus told us very simply to love all people even as we love God, and even as we love ourselves. The fine print on that one Great Commandment is that if we cannot love God, and if we cannot love ourselves, then how in the Heck can we expect to love anyone else?  (Yes, children, RuPaul has it right on that count!) By the simple logic of what Jesus has taught us to do, this preacher has spoken against everything that the Christ and being a Christian teaches us. These words he speaks bring pain to those who can stand on the streets and say “NO!” to his face. NO! This is not at all what Jesus taught. And worse, it brings fear to those around us (gay, straight, whatever) who – for whatever reason or understanding – cannot stand up and speak for themselves.

  • “Oh my God, I must be the only person in this church-house who feels this way about who I love. Listen to them all saying ‘Amen.’”
  • “Dear God! I cannot disagree with these people on this issue because I will lose my standing in this church and this community.”
  • “Heavenly Father: if I don’t see anything wrong with these folks who aren’t bothering me, then am I, too, a Queer Lover?”
  • “Jesus. Does this mean that I am not even good enough to live?”

His words have brought undue harm on all these people, and he has left behind his calling to be a spiritual leader in order to speak of Votes and Killing and Starvation. And he speaks against everything the Bible teaches us about love.

What do do?

This is another point on which the Bible is quite clear. The 18th chapter of Matthew gives us the points of discipline when we know of those around us who have done wrong:

  1. Go to him in private and speak to him about his faults so that you may help him get back on track. If he listens to you, then you have won your brother back.
  2. If he does not listen to you, go back and take one or two more with you so that BY THE MOUTH OF TWO OR THREE WITNESSES every fact may be confirmed.
  3. If he still refuses to listen to you, TELL IT TO THE CHURCH and if he refuses even to listen to the Church, then let him be to you (the worst possible thing you could be at that time) like a tax collector or a gentile. In other words, if you totally mess up so bad that the whole church tells you what you did and you still don’t take heed, then you – my friend – are lower than the lowest. Please note: there is no mention in this section on the loss of salvation or loss of God’s forgiveness. This section is about how we are each one of us to treat each other as disciplined leaders who are on the correct track to help others.

The passage finishes by reminding us of another version of The Golden Rule that Mr. Ebenezer Scrooge can tell you a lot about:

“…whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

(The word there is “loosed” not “lost.” In other words: that which you turn loose of (abandon) here, shall be abandoned to you in heaven.)

My challenge to this man: you know where you have sinned, and you must listen to the voices of the Christian church around you who have reminded you in many ways how you have sinned and fallen short of the eye of God. Now is your opportunity to listen and to make right, as much as you can. Realize that some wrongs you have committed with just a few sentences can never be made right and it is within you – and your conversation with God – as to how you are to live with that, moving forward as a better, redeemed person. To put this in the parlance that Baptist people can clearly understand:

You need to GET RIGHT with the LORD.

My challenge to the folks sitting in that room shouting “Amen.” Search your heart and your conscience. Believe for yourself and don’t just Amen along with some unread preacher who tries to pull you away from your communion with God. Just as the man who spoke these  wrongs, it is now your opportunity to live an upright life by recognizing what you have done wrong. And by searching in your moments of prayer about finding ways to make amends.

You need to GET RIGHT with the LORD.

My challenge to the people who heard these words of hate and death and were injured by them: as I have said before, never let a preacher tell you that you are a worthless sinner.

Never stand by and allow someone to say (in the name of God) that the best solution for you is to be locked away where you and yours can die.

Do NOT add your Amens to such anti-Jesus rhetoric. Stand up and shout back: HELL no! That is not what Jesus taught us and that is not how God would expect us to behave.

My challenge to those who heard the words and in the secret places of their hearts feel fear for their own lives, for the lives of someone they love, or for how others will judge them if they stand up for JESUS on this issue. Follow the words of the song you learned as a child:

“Red and yellow black and white, they are PRECIOUS in his sight. JESUS loves the little children of the world!”

And then, when you are so tired of that song that you cannot sit by quietly, listen to another one:

JESUS loves me, THIS I know. For the BIBLE tells me so. …
Yes, JESUS loves me – the Bible tells me so!”

Stop arguing arcane points of what you think God believes on a certain topic because chances are quite large that you are wrong. So am I. So is the guy down the street. So was Mother Teressa. We do not know the exact mind of God, yet within us is the chance to see – and live out – God’s intentions.

According to Christian faith teachings, we regular guys are all sinners, and we have all at one time or another come up short in living for God. The redemption to be found in that idea is:

what do you do the next day?

Do you recognize what you have done that is wrong and make changes to ensure that you don’t go that way again? Or do you turn a blind eye on those around you and justify hatred and death-wishing on other people by some chopped to death mis-quote of something in the Hebrew Bible? In order to get to the path of the growing, more-enlightened spiritual person, that choice will be yours to make, and, if all else fails, just as JESUS taught us:

fail on the side of love.

There’s a message in this for non-religious people too and I hope you’ve stuck with me long enough to read this part. Do not hate all religious – Christian – Baptist – etc. people based on the words and actions of one bad preacher and one hateful congregation. Setting aside the politics of this church over here and that denomination over there, I know that not all Baptists believe the shuck-and-jive lies of this sinful man, or act in this abominable manner.

Don’t use this as your opportunity to fuel up the hate against all people of faith because “an eye for an eye” only leads us to blindness.

Use this as an opportunity to learn and understand these teachings (even if you do not agree) and even if you find yourself “immune” from the preachers’ words of rank hatred, be aware that there are some around you who are not. It is then up to us to show – by example – the actual meaning of Christian love and acceptance.

Yes, JESUS loves me…
the Bible tells me so.

Keep the faith!
- Amen

We Draw Forward Our Strength – a lectio divino meditation

 


 

It is God,
who, for his own generous purpose,
gives you the intention
and power
to act.

 

Adapted from Philippians 2:12-16

12 Therefore, my dear friends, as you have always obeyed—not only in my presence, but now much more in my absence—continue to work out your salvation with fear and trembling, 13 for it is God who works in you to will and to act in order to fulfill his good purpose.  14 Do everything without grumbling or arguing, 15 so that you may become blameless and pure, “children of God without fault in a warped and crooked generation.”  Then you will shine among them like stars in the sky 16 as you hold firmly to the word of life. And then I will be able to boast on the day of Christ that I did not run or labor in vain. (NIV)